.png)
Blind Spots vs. False Positives — Which One Kills Faster?

.png)

In a recent customer engagement, we found something far more dangerous than alert fatigue — massive blind spots hidden beneath a perfectly normal-looking SOC.
This customer had been relying on a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP).
Every week, around 60 to 70 alerts were escalated, investigated, and closed on time. Dashboards looked healthy, SLA metrics were green, and everything appeared under control.
But when AiStrike stepped in and analyzed the underlying detections, the story changed completely.
At AiStrike, we always start with detection analysis — not ticket queues.
We look at the telemetry, integrations, and detection logic before touching a single alert. Within days, several red flags emerged.
No cloud security alerts were being ingested into the SIEM — none.
Despite having critical workloads on Azure and AWS, the customer’s cloud activity was completely off the radar.
Identity-based attacks, privilege escalations, misconfigurations — all invisible to the SOC.
The EDR platform, which should have been the richest source of behavioral data, contributed less than 1% of total alerts.
Even stranger: only one user showed any “malicious” behavior in the past 30 days — statistically impossible for an enterprise of this size.
That immediately raised questions:
When detection quality improves, SOC automation compounds that value — every AI-driven triage or response decision becomes faster and more accurate.
Here’s a harder question:
Are MSSPs and MDRs truly motivated to help you reduce alert volume?
If their value is measured by how many alerts they review or close, what happens when optimization cuts 100,000 alerts down to 5,000?
Does that make them more effective — or less “valuable” in the customer’s eyes?
That’s a topic for another day.
But the takeaway is simple:
You can manage false positives.
You can’t manage what you can’t see.
SOC efficiency isn’t about how many tickets you close — it’s about how many attacks you actually detect.
When organizations start by strengthening visibility, optimizing detections, and aligning telemetry, they transform from reactive to proactive.
Because in cybersecurity, noise can be tuned out — but blind spots can take you down.
AiStrike is redefining modern security operations with a detection-first approach powered by Composite AI — the foundation of the SOC Intelligence Fabric.
We don’t just automate response; we engineer better detections, ensuring the SOC sees what others miss.
In short — visibility, telemetry, and detection logic were all broken. And none of these had been identified as issues before AiStrike came in.
We also discovered that the SIEM in use was UEBA-centric, optimized for “rare occurrences.”
That’s useful when anomalies are true indicators of compromise — but in this case, the system was surfacing unusual events that had little to do with real threats.
The raw numbers told the truth:
With minimal tuning, we reduced more than 90% of the noise — freeing up analysts to focus on what mattered most: improving coverage and fixing visibility gaps.
False positives drain time.
But blind spots drain trust.
A SOC measured only by how fast it closes tickets may completely miss the bigger question:
Are we even detecting what matters?
At AiStrike, we believe automation starts with strong detection engineering — not more alert handling.
That means:
AiStrike acts as a Force Multiplier for People and Technology, enabling small teams to operate like enterprise SOCs — and large enterprises to achieve investigation depth, not just speed.
AiStrike isn’t another alert management tool — it’s the detection engineering and automation fabric that transforms your SOC from reactive to proactive, from overwhelmed to intelligent.
AiStrike — SOC, Done Right.